<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://feeds.qzone.qq.com/rss.xsl" version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:qz="http://qzone.qq.com">
<channel>
<title><![CDATA[mradw]]></title>
<description><![CDATA[ ]]></description>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com</link>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:43:37 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<generator>Qzone</generator>
<language>zh-cn</language>
<copyright>Copyright (C), 2005-2008, Tencent Tech. Co., Ltd.</copyright>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:45:26 GMT</pubDate>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[他妈的还得再考一遍]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193327126</link>
<description><![CDATA[他妈的还得再考一遍GRE <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193327126#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:45:26 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193327126</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[向小众致敬！]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193243131</link>
<description><![CDATA[pconline的清风版主评了十大口袋。<br>实际，我是耿耿于怀的。作为m的铁杆，上次他旗舰里面居然没有A1，其实A1也比较牵强。然而这次没有X，颇失公正。回帖里面，我也表达了这个意思，X毕竟是小众，没有也罢。没人知道。<br>史蒂夫乔布斯果然是个牛人。它的新imac用玻璃和铝是因为“最好回收”。佩服了，然而，小众。还是小众。<br>罗技的大甲壳虫，微软的战备包实在让我觉得，鼠标业也终于见到瓶颈了。我在思考，下一站的鼠标将是什么？想象，激光真的给我们带来了什么呢?当本质的改变已经无法影响实际的使用的时候，本质的改变到底还是否有意义？或许还是小的创意，比如，加上滚轮来的实际吧。鼠标已经脱离了大众，他们服务的对象，只是雷神玩家们罢了。然而，一个普通的雷神玩家，我，是没有发觉什么的不同的。所以，鼠标这种东西，手感很重要。雷神也是小众了，大家都玩半条命去了。<br>索尼可能也是很无奈。U10/20/30/40/50/60到L1,终于停止了。卡片和对薄的追求。所以，我并不喜欢sony这种大众品味。理光更喜欢，然而画质是硬伤。很另类。另类的东西常常会受到尊重或者崇拜，理光也是如此，然而不好卖。似乎是必然的。sony似乎很聪明。然而，我是宁愿喜欢那种不好卖的另类的。所以，我尊重史蒂夫乔布斯。所以，我尊重理光。所以，我尊重R1，但是，不好卖的。<br>诺顿360卖到499元人民币，太便宜了。难道安全软件免费的日子真的入趋势所说的那样，到来了吗？<br>HP和柯达的合并我觉得很好。当然，不会像当年，hp和康柏，迈拓和希捷一样的感觉了。实际上，我认为，很不错，至少，打击下日系。既然爱国者不争气，明基也仅仅是换包装。双鸟折翼。<br>VB100很牛吗？金山我很尊敬。但是，我只是很讨厌它的毒霸。看看微点吧，小众，被尊重，是的，小众。<br>奥林巴斯怎么样？也是一个小众。<br>其实，还是觉得，最大的特色就是没有特色。看看IBM的设计吧，和苹果就是两个极端。一个以不变应万变，一个常常出其不意的变。<br>看看佳能的A系列吧，也是不变的造型，sony的T，是变造型不变核心。不过，现在的新T好多了。这个叫做“传承企业的设计风格”。是吗？看看人家IBM和苹果是怎么传承的，看看人家爱立信是怎么传承的，索尼毁掉了爱立信的工业设计精髓，他还会毁掉美能达吗？ <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193243131#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:25:31 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1193243131</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[3：27~4：00的梦]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/6</link>
<description><![CDATA[其实我还是挺怀念北京的。从刚刚的梦里就看出来了。梦到一个和妈妈一起从北京离开的场景。先是我去了火车站周边，但是南边买了7串羊肉串（可能是没吃饱）发现没烤熟，然后找北边的有一个人，跟他说让他把这个给烤熟了，代价是在他那儿再买一串。但是没有讲价钱的事情。后来走了一圈，好像是去买去珠海的票，但发现晚上实在是人太凋敝了，人很少，一种肃杀的感觉，见到了大姐，同时大姐也是做梦梦到去那儿的。我就说，我一定要醒。大姐说，可没那么容易。我于是想，会不会大姐也同时梦到了我，后来推翻这个观点了。与是挣扎了一下，有过徘徊，醒了。后又睡着了，去烤羊肉串那里找那个人。他问我要不要“炸”加淀粉。我说好。但是发现是圈套，他是想问我多收钱。我很是不满意。但是他是新疆人，总是不好惹的。但我一想，这是做梦，就决定耍一下流氓了。实际上人家本来就是比南边的多一个炸的步骤的。多收一块钱也不能算是敲诈了。我于是耍流氓，他很是惧怕，蹲下来躲到一边。摆摊的有好多人，另外的跟他是同乡的一位似乎比他更害怕。我于是计划是否要耍酷，后来的确耍酷，羊肉串都没有拿。于是醒了。又过了几秒钟，又睡觉了。梦到了妈妈。我和妈妈从北京离开，坐车，好像要故意做多一个站，或许是根本不确定是哪个站下。见到一个师妹，挺可爱的一个。然后我把一盒大盒的蓝罐曲奇和一只白色的猫给她，她说曲奇本是啊苏送给我的，我为什么转送给她呢？我说阿苏显然是不了解我喜欢什么。实际上我是不大喜欢曲奇的。但是这句话很可能是我故意说出来的。因为我本是非常喜欢吃曲奇的啊。然后我在五棵松下了车，好像是一个住宅小区。她在一边挥手和我道别。就只剩下我和妈妈。我指着回去的方向，说火车站在那边。然后又爬到一个天桥上面了。我说，让我再看看有没有遗漏什么东西没带走。天桥下面几乎没有了汽车，很是凄凉，我突然哭了。心里面很怀念北京的感觉。然后我又想到，这个梦可能没有必要再做下去了，于是我想想，从五棵松走到火车站的那段就没有必要做梦了，于是就醒了。<br> <br>显然是和这几天的状态相关的。今天高考，我想到了、我梦到了北京，很是自然的事情。那是我的一个大的点。而且，今天得知了其它组农民工的获奖，我很是不能释怀，于是梦到了凄凉的场景。又妈妈睡前打电话过来。就有了妈妈。妈妈在梦中总是好的角色。今天在阿里巴巴吃的羊肉串很是不过瘾，于是梦到了羊肉串。而且是没有烤熟的羊肉串。火车站分明是映射天河客运站，从南边到北边分明是映射作地铁从五山到天河客运站。<br>弗洛伊德的《释梦》看来还是比较有效的。 <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/6#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 20:29:50 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/6</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[GRE 报名]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/5</link>
<description><![CDATA[交了钱了就安心了。给ETS作贡献了。<br>2007-09-07<br>2007-08-30<br>2007-09-21<br>1481很是贵。终于安心复习了。no choice <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/5#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:10:56 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/5</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[1Ds Mark III]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/4</link>
<description><![CDATA[i didn't really know the news before i browsed dpreview.com <br>i got a great among of photos, and i turned to pconline and 色影无忌 to get some remarks. <br>it is not a full 135mm CMOS, instead it's a ASP-H size, with a aspect of 1.3X. what's as a return is a 10 fps of continuing shooting rate. it's  top till now. Canon make a great step beyond Nikon. i regard as a great creativity is he used a daul Digic processor which made the 10mps possible. <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/4#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:43:57 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/4</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[[转]用热工老师的照片做桌面拉~~]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/3</link>
<description><![CDATA[啊哈哈哈~~~ <br>我每天都见到热工老师拉~~ <br>打开电脑就见到了呢~~~ <br>多亏随老大啊!!! <br>随老大是好男人!!! <br>热工老师好有型啊~~~  <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/3#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>12</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 06:13:25 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/3</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[Kodak 是这么玩的]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/2</link>
<description><![CDATA[you press the botton, we do the rest. <br>Kodak give photographing to the mass. and he create a new system to produce photos. is the tranditional film. and the &quot;film&quot; and &quot;develope shop&quot; mode is a Kodak's mode. <br>this is revolutional. when photographing become widly use in common people(not just is pro level) another page is created. kodak is a company i admire. <br>for CCD, which is Kodak's another creation, say DC is not because it's covenient or cheap, what is DC's really revolutional job is this small toy bring the possibility of shotting anywhere forgetting the cost one will spend when pressing the botten. this change lead to commen people shotting anywhere, in any occation, and this make photographing popular. this is a 全民艺术运动的有利条件。 <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/2#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/2</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[论Pentax 的 K10D]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1</link>
<description><![CDATA[it168.com claim that this DSLR will be the least prise in the circle of this year's DSLR product line among the 10 Mega Pixal CCD/CMOS DSLRs. <br>eventhough the K10D is not yet on the market, i really think it's a good news. say at least we have an other option. well the K10D was quite a bit advance when comparing with the same prise sony's A100, Canon's 400D and Nikon's D80. <br>But what i warry a lot is Pentax, being a Third level DSLR producer, let's review the previous products it release, we will easily find out that the producer is lack of so called technical advance. this is such a big ban between the class 3 and the class 1. the previous products are all in the beginner level. and pentax claim that his DSLR is the tidyest in the market, but as to DSLR, the size will not me the smaller the better as in the card size compatitions, Canon's 350D is too small to feel like a &quot;pro&quot; one, and holding it is not so comfortable. what will Pentax provide in the future? will it provide enough lens and accosications? there questions maybe Pentax is woddering too. <br>surely enough, Nikon will not provide a CCD anti-shake system like Sony's steady-shot(super? pro? no matter what they called), how can Nikon sell its VR lens? the same case will be in Canon's IS.  <br>all in all, K10D will be a good choice for new commers. but toward me, i have 2 nikkor lens, and a DSLR is not in my schdule, my Minolta A1 is quite enough for me. and i will not leave it before i press the bottem the 27,000 time.  <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:31:44 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/1</guid>
</item>

<item>
<title><![CDATA[mradw]]></title>
<link>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/0</link>
<description><![CDATA[this is only a test~ <!--v:3.2--> ]]></description>
<category><![CDATA[个人日记]]></category>
<author><![CDATA[181983081@qq.com(mradw)]]></author>
<comments>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/0#comment</comments>
<qz:effect>512</qz:effect>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>http://181983081.qzone.qq.com/blog/0</guid>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

