Christopher

Excerpts from David Stern's 'favorite' book, Blowing the Whistle, by Tim Donaghy

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 06:46:39 GMT

这TM实在是太欢乐了。“赌圣”Tim Donaghy的书，还没出版（是不敢把）。
Here's a glimpse

On gambling refs:
To have a little fun at the expense of the worst troublemakers, the referees working the game would sometimes make a modest friendly wager amongst themselves: first ref to give one of the bad boys a technical foul wouldn't have to tip the ball boy that night. In the NBA, ball boys set up the referees' locker room and keep it stocked with food and beer for the postgame meal. We usually ran the kid ragged with a variety of personal requests and then slipped him a $20 bill. Technically, the winner of the bet won twice — he didn't have to pay the kid and he got to call a T on Mr. Foul-Mouthed Big-Shot Du Jour.
After the opening tip, it was hilarious as the three of us immediately focused our full attention on the intended victim, waiting for something, anything, to justify a technical foul. If the guy so much as looked at one of us and mumbled, we rang him up. Later in the referees' locker room, we would down a couple of brews, eat some chicken wings, and laugh like hell.
We had another variation of this gag simply referred to as the "first foul of the game" bet. While still in the locker room before tip-off, we would make a wager on which of us would call the game's first foul. That referee would either have to pay the ball boy or pick up the dinner tab for the other two referees. Sometimes, the ante would be $50 a guy. Like the technical foul bet, it was hilarious — only this time we were testing each other's nerves to see who had the guts to hold out the longest before calling a personal foul. There were occasions when we would hold back for two or three minutes — an eternity in an NBA game — before blowing the whistle. It didn't matter if bodies were flying all over the place; no fouls were called because no one wanted to lose the bet.
We played this little game during the regular season and summer league. After a game, all three refs would gather around the VCR and watch a replay of the game. Early in the contest, the announcers would say, "Holy cow! They're really letting them play tonight!" If they only knew...
During one particular summer game, Duke Callahan, Mark Wunderlich, and I made it to the three-minute mark in the first quarter without calling a foul. We were running up and down the court, laughing our asses off as the players got hammered with no whistles. The players were exhausted from the nonstop running when Callahan finally called the first foul because Mikki Moore of the New Jersey Nets literally tackled an opposing player right in front of him. Too bad for Callahan — he lost the bet.
I became so good at this game that if an obvious foul was committed right in front of me, I would call a travel or a three-second violation instead. Those violations are not personal fouls, so I was still in the running to win the bet. The players would look at me with disbelief on their faces as if to say, "What the hell was that?"
On star treatment:

Relationships between NBA players and referees were generally all over the board — love, hate, and everything in-between. Some players, even very good ones, were targeted by referees and the league because they were too talented for their own good. Raja Bell, formerly of the Phoenix Suns and now a member of the Charlotte Bobcats, was one of those players. A defensive specialist throughout his career, Bell had a reputation for being a "star stopper." His defensive skills were so razor sharp that he could shut down a superstar, or at least make him work for his points. Kobe Bryant was often frustrated by Bell's tenacity on defense. Let's face it, no one completely shuts down a player of Kobe's caliber, but Bell could frustrate Kobe, take him out of his game, and interrupt his rhythm.
You would think that the NBA would love a guy who plays such great defense. Think again! Star stoppers hurt the promotion of marquee players. Fans don't pay high prices to see players like Raja Bell — they pay to see superstars like Kobe Bryant score 40 points. Basketball purists like to see good defense, but the NBA wants the big names to score big points.
If a player of Kobe's stature collides with the likes of Raja Bell, the call will almost always go for Kobe and against Bell. As part of our ongoing training and game preparation, NBA referees regularly receive game-action video tape from the league office. Over the years, I have reviewed many recorded hours of video involving Raja Bell. The footage I analyzed usually illustrated fouls being called against Bell, rarely for him. The message was subtle but clear — call fouls against the star stopper because he's hurting the game.
If Kobe Bryant had two fouls in the first or second quarter and went to the bench, one referee would tell the other two, "Kobe's got two fouls. Let's make sure that if we call a foul on him, it's an obvious foul, because otherwise he's gonna go back to the bench. If he is involved in a play where a foul is called, give the foul to another player."
Similarly, when games got physically rough, we would huddle up and agree to tighten the game up. So we started calling fouls on guys who didn't really matter — "ticky-tack" or "touch" fouls where one player just touched another but didn't really impede his progress. Under regular circumstances these wouldn't be fouls, but after a skirmish we wanted to regain control. We would never call these types of fouls on superstars, just on the average players who didn't have star status. It was important to keep the stars on the floor.
Allen Iverson provides a good example of a player who generated strong reaction, both positive and negative, within the corps of NBA referees. For instance, veteran referee Steve Javie hated Allen Iverson and was loathe [sic] to give him a favorable call. If Javie was on the court when Iverson was playing, I would always bet on the other team to win or at least cover the spread. No matter how many times Iverson hit the floor, he rarely saw the foul line. By contrast, referee Joe Crawford had a grandson who idolized Iverson. I once saw Crawford bring the boy out of the stands and onto the floor during warm-ups to meet the superstar. Iverson and Crawford's grandson were standing there, shaking hands, smiling, talking about all kinds of things. If Joe Crawford was on the court, I was pretty sure Iverson's team would win or at least cover the spread.
Madison Square Garden was the place to be for a marquee matchup between the Miami Heat and New York Knicks. I worked the game with Derrick Stafford and Gary Zielinski, knowing that the Knicks were a sure bet to get favorable treatment that night. Derrick Stafford had a close relationship with Knicks coach Isiah Thomas, and he despised Heat coach Pat Riley. I picked the Knicks without batting an eye and settled in for a roller-coaster ride on the court.
During pregame warm-ups, Shaquille O'Neal approached Stafford and asked him to let some air out of the ball.
"Is this the game ball?" O'Neal asked. "It's too hard. C'mon, D, let a little air out of it."
Stafford then summoned one of the ball boys, asked for an air needle, and let some air out of the ball, getting a big wink and a smile from O'Neal.
On makeup calls:
I remember one nightmarish game I worked with Joe Crawford and Phil Robinson. Minnesota and New Orleans were in a tight game going into the last minute, and Crawford told us to make sure that we were 100 percent sure of the call every time we blew the whistle. When play resumed, Minnesota coach Flip Saunders started yelling at us to make a call. Robinson got intimidated and blew the whistle on New Orleans. The only problem was it wasn't the right call. Tim Floyd, the Hornets' coach, went nuts. He stormed the court and kicked the ball into the top row of the stadium. Robinson had to throw him out, and Minnesota won the game.
[...]
Later that week, Ronnie Nunn told me that we could have made something up at the other end against Minnesota to even things out. He even got specific — maybe we should have considered calling a traveling violation on Kevin Garnett. Talk about the politics of the game! Of course the official statement from the league office will always read, "There is no such thing as a makeup call."
On his fellow referees:
Dick Bavetta

Crawford wanted the game over quickly so he could kick back, relax, and have a beer; [Dick Bavetta] wanted it to keep going so he could hear his name on TV. He actually paid an American Airlines employee to watch all the games he worked and write down everything the TV commentators said about him. No matter how late the game was over, he'd wake her up for a full report. He loved the attention.
That very first time Jack and I bet on an NBA game, Dick was on the court. The team we picked lost the game, but it covered the large point spread and that's how we won the money. Because of the matchup that night, I had some notion of who might win the game, but that's not why I was confident enough to pull the trigger and pick the other team. The real reason I picked the losing team was that I was just about certain they would cover the spread, no matter how badly they played. That is where Dick Bavetta comes into the picture.
From my earliest involvement with Bavetta, I learned that he likes to keep games close, and that when a team gets down by double-digit points, he helps the players save face. He accomplishes this act of mercy by quietly, and frequently, blowing the whistle on the team that's having the better night. Team fouls suddenly become one-sided between the contestants, and the score begins to tighten up. That's the way Dick Bavetta referees a game — and everyone in the league knew it.
Fellow referee Danny Crawford attended Michael Jordan's Flight School Camp years ago and later told me that he had long conversations with other referees and NBA players about how Bavetta propped up weak teams. Danny told me that Jordan himself said that everyone in the league knew that Bavetta cheated in games and that the players and coaches just hoped he would be cheating for them on game night. Cheating? That's a very strong word to use in any sentence that includes the name Dick Bavetta. Is the conscious act of helping a team crawl back into a contest "cheating"? The credo of referees from high school to the NBA is "call them like you see them." Of course, that's a lot different than purposely calling more fouls against one team as opposed to another. Did Bavetta have a hidden agenda? Or was he the ultimate company man, making sure the NBA and its fans got a competitive game most times he was on
the court?
Studying under Dick Bavetta for 13 years was like pursuing a graduate degree in advanced game manipulation. He knew how to marshal the tempo and tone of a game better than any referee in the league, by far. He also knew how to take subtle — and not so subtle — cues from the NBA front office and extend a playoff series or, worse yet, change the complexion of that series.
The 2002 Western Conference Finals between the Los Angeles Lakers and the Sacramento Kings presents a stunning example of game and series manipulation at its ugliest. As the teams prepared for Game 6 at the Staples Center, Sacramento had a 3–2 lead in the series. The referees assigned to work Game 6 were Dick Bavetta, Bob Delaney, and Ted Bernhardt. As soon as the referees for the game were chosen, the rest of us knew immediately that there would be a Game 7. A prolonged series was good for the league, good for the networks, and good for the game. Oh, and one more thing: it was great for the big-market, star-studded Los Angeles Lakers.
In the pregame meeting prior to Game 6, the league office sent down word that certain calls — calls that would have benefitted the Lakers — were being missed by the referees. This was the type of not-so-subtle information that I and other referees were left to interpret. After receiving the dispatch, Bavetta openly talked about the fact that the league wanted a Game 7.
"If we give the benefit of the calls to the team that's down in the series, nobody's going to complain. The series will be even at three apiece, and then the better team can win Game 7," Bavetta stated.
As history shows, Sacramento lost Game 6 in a wild come-from-behind thriller that saw the Lakers repeatedly sent to the foul line by the referees. For other NBA referees watching the game on television, it was a shameful performance by Bavetta's crew, one of the most poorly officiated games of all time.
The 2002 series certainly wasn't the first or last time Bavetta weighed in on an important game. He also worked Game 7 of the 2000 Western Conference Finals between the Lakers and the Trail Blazers. The Lakers were down by 13 at the start of the fourth quarter when Bavetta went to work. The Lakers outscored Portland 31–13 in the fourth quarter and went on to win the game and the series. It certainly didn't hurt the Lakers that they got to shoot 37 free throws compared to a paltry 16 for the Trail Blazers.
Two weeks before the 2003–04 season ended, Bavetta and I were assigned to officiate a game in Oakland. That afternoon before the tip-off, we were discussing an upcoming game on our schedule. It was the last regular-season game we were scheduled to work, pitting Denver against San Antonio. Denver had lost a game a few weeks prior because of a mistake made by the referees, a loss that could be the difference between them making or missing the playoffs. Bavetta told me Denver needed the win and that it would look bad for the staff and the league if the Nuggets missed the playoffs by one game. There were still a few games left on the schedule before the end of the season, and the standings could potentially change. But on that day in Oakland, Bavetta looked at me and casually stated, "Denver will win if they need the game. That's why I'm on it."
I was thinking, How is Denver going to win on the road in San Antonio? At the time, the Spurs were arguably the best team in the league. Bavetta answered my question before it was asked.
"Duncan will be on the bench with three fouls within the first five minutes of the game," he calmly stated.
Bavetta went on to inform me that it wasn't the first time the NBA assigned him to a game for a specific purpose. He cited examples, including the 1993 playoff series when he put New Jersey guard Drazen Petrovic on the bench with quick fouls to help Cleveland beat the Nets. He also spoke openly about the 2002 Los Angeles–Sacramento series and called himself the NBA's "go-to guy."
As it turned out, Denver didn't need the win after all; they locked up a spot in the playoffs before they got to San Antonio. In a twist of fate, it was the Spurs that ended up needing the win to have a shot at the division title, and Bavetta generously accommodated. In our pregame meeting, he talked about how important the game was to San Antonio and how meaningless it was to Denver, and that San Antonio was going to get the benefit of the calls that night. Armed with this inside information, I called Jack Concannon before the game and told him to bet the Spurs.
To no surprise, we won big. San Antonio blew Denver out of the building that evening, winning by 26 points. When Jack called me the following morning, he expressed amazement at the way an NBA game could be manipulated. Sobering, yes; amazing, no. That's how the game is played in the National Basketball Association.
In a follow-up email to the referee staff and the league office, Crawford railed about the lack of respect players had for referees and the NBA's failure to back him up. Then, in a direct shot at the league's embracing of referees like Dick Bavetta, he fired a sharp rebuke:
"I also told [Stu Jackson] that the staff is an officiating staff of Dick Bavetta's — schmoozing and sucking people's asses to get ahead. Awful, but it is reality."
Crawford also touched on the fact that he was being excluded from working the playoffs that year:
"Look on the bright side everybody, MORE playoff games for you guys and Dick, maybe you will get to be crew chief in the 7th game of the Finals, which is a travesty in itself you even being in the Finals."
Tommy Nunez

My favorite Tommy Nunez story is from the 2007 playoffs when the San Antonio Spurs were able to get past the Phoenix Suns in the second round. Of course, what many fans didn't know was that Phoenix had someone working against them behind the scenes. Nunez was the group supervisor for that playoff series, and he definitely had a rooting interest.
Nunez loved the Hispanic community in San Antonio and had a lot of friends there. He had been a referee for 30 years and loved being on the road; in fact, he said that the whole reason he had become a group supervisor was to keep getting out of the house. So Nunez wanted to come back to San Antonio for the conference finals. Plus, he, like many other referees, disliked Suns owner Robert Sarver for the way he treated officials. Both of these things came into play when he prepared the referees for the games in the staff meetings. I remember laughing with him and saying, "You would love to keep coming back here." He was pointing out everything that Phoenix was able to get away with and never once told us to look for anything in regard to San Antonio. Nunez should have a championship ring on his finger.
Derrick Stafford and Jess Kersey

Of course, Stafford had some friends in the league, too. I worked a Knicks game in Madison Square Garden with him on February 26, 2007. New York shot an astounding 39 free throws that night to Miami's paltry eight. It seemed like Stafford was working for the Knicks, calling fouls on Miami like crazy. Isiah Thomas was coaching the Knicks, and after New York's four-point victory, a guy from the Knicks came to our locker room looking for Stafford, who was in the shower. He told us that Thomas sent him to retrieve Stafford's home address; apparently, Stafford had asked the coach before the game for some autographed sneakers and jerseys for his kids. Suddenly, it all made sense.
Referee Jess Kersey was another one of Isiah Thomas' guys. They'd talk openly on the phone as if they had known each other since childhood. Thomas even told Kersey that he was pushing to get Ronnie Nunn removed from the supervisor's job so that Kersey and Dick Bavetta could take over. This sort of thing happened all the time, and I kept waiting for a Knicks game when Stafford, Bavetta, and Kersey were working together. It was like knowing the winning lottery numbers before the drawing!
Steve Javie & Allen Iverson

And then there was the ongoing feud between Javie and 76ers superstar Allen Iverson. The rift was so bad that Philadelphia general manager Billy King often called the league office to complain about Javie's treatment of Iverson during a game.
Iverson was eventually traded to Denver, and in his first game against his former team, he was tossed after two technicals. Afterward, Iverson implied Javie had a grudge against him, saying, "I thought I got fouled on that play, and I said I thought that he was calling the game personal, and he threw me out. His fuse is real short anyway, and I should have known that I couldn't say anything anyway. It's been something personal with me and him since I got in the league. This was just the perfect game for him to try and make me look bad." The league fined Iverson $25,000 for his comments, but most of the league referees thought the punishment was too lenient and were upset he wasn't suspended. As a result, we collectively decided to dispense a little justice of our own, sticking it to Iverson whenever we could.
Shortly after the Javie-Iverson incident, I worked a Jazz-Nuggets contest in Denver on January 6, 2007. During the pregame meeting, my fellow referees Bernie Fryer and Gary Zielinski agreed that we were going to strictly enforce the palming rule against Iverson. Palming the ball was something Iverson loved to do, but if he so much as came close to a palm, we were going to blow the whistle. Obviously, our actions were in direct retaliation for Iverson's rant against Javie. True to form, I immediately excused myself and made an important phone call.
Sticking to our pregame pledge, each of us whistled Iverson for palming in the first quarter — we all wanted in on the fun. The violations seemed to affect Iverson's rhythm and he played terribly that night, shooting 5-for-19 with five turnovers. After getting repeatedly whistled all night long, Iverson approached me in an act of submission.

"How long am I going to be punished for Javie?" he quietly inquired.

"Don't know what you're talking about, Allen," I responded.

老子一生就写了一篇日志

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:30:29 GMT

杜祥琬院士：“老子一生就写了一篇文章，只有5000字，现在只能算一篇论文，按照现在的学位标准可能连硕士学位都得不到。这就启发我们反思，对定量和定性的评价该如何掌握。”

中青报：“……杜祥琬院士（中国工程院副院长）认为，必须建立科学的评价指标体系，改变重数量轻质量的倾向。‘我一生就写了一篇文章，只有5000字，现在只能算一篇论文，按照现在的学位标准可能连硕士学位都得不到。这就启发我们反思，对定量和定性的评价该如何掌握。”
_________________________________________________________________________
"这位记者你有什么特长？"
--"我。。。我。。。反射弧特长。"

拜［托］，让我过吧

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Sun, 20 Sep 2009 15:26:44 GMT

以后如果有人对我吹嘘说在阿尔伯特公园现场看过F1，墨尔本公园看澳网之类的，我也可以很有面子地说，我在里面现场考过toefl。

俗话say得好，电脑TM就是个害人东西！尤其是装了Windows95的考场机。

考生不多，中日韩及南美各国代表各一人。我大笑说好巧啊居然没有澳洲和欧美人，上次sat澳洲人占大半呢。出口我就后悔了因为大家都震惊地看着我。

从9点多考到下午1：45。考完第一部分阅读我就饿了，熬了4个小时才下去IGA买了吃的。想吐，饿久了就吃不下了。

回来的路上瞟了眼melboune show，没劲呢……
一家咖啡店的门口，以为Jason Kidd被Cuban买断合同沦落到墨尔本街头卖唱了。

一黑一白两人唱得真不错，可以把Kanya 'the Jackass' West鄙视死了．
总结：２１世纪最经典的两句话是
１．Ｄｅｓｃｒｉｂｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｃｉｔｙ　ｙｏｕ　ｌｉｖｅ　ｉｎ．（reprise x 5）
２．Yo, Taylor! I, I’m really happy for you, I’m-a let you finish, but Beyonce had one of the best videos of all time!

可惜youtube被墙了，不然就能解释下第二条以及改编版本了。

7秒or更少

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:27:12 GMT

第一次打开托福模考书，是在五分钟以前。打开就看见俞敏洪教导say，“不要制定不切实际的计划，如一周内学完本书”。我的托福考试是在本周末，我目前正在高考一模中。FML

大家好我在丁山某间小黑屋里

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:43:20 GMT

Outta question, 你看到的这篇日志是从第二段开始写起的；第一段由于有太多的草泥马已经被河蟹了。
2009/06/22 6:25pm
打完球。回来后的第一次，天气太闷骚了，不想动。一出市中门就被防疫局的人带走了，说CA178上猪流感扩散到好几个人了，包括坐在57F和52H的人。我的位置54C在3排范围之内。7天，隔离就隔离把，反正我妈这几天在上海，我爸可能去新疆几天。大连是去不了了，小胖那帮混蛋现在已经回到宜兴了吧！?礼物等我出来再给我吧，另外我也带回来点吃的东西到时再给吧。
接着说，我被带到防疫站之后，戴口罩，量体温，抽血……我已经两年多没生病了，非要把我整出病来么？在飞机上我和CC就达成共识了：那帮生化男的死腔调太让人看不惯了！宜兴的居然更变态，一群人面具口罩手套白大褂，拐啦嗒相（鬼样子）！傍晚西风刮起，一群人奔丧一样往我西边跑；过会刮东风，一群人托着褂子往东边跑。说是怕我空气传播病毒！S-O-B！！我问是不是医科大专毕业的都分配到防疫站工作，生化人的声音以及他的一脸严肃穿透了面罩：“你现在体温偏高，37.8度。”刚打完球体温能不高吗！？我fxxk ur sister的时候说不定有39度呢！当然后一句话我是在心里说的。我知道我体温是一直偏高的，在飞机上测也是偏高，我也知道如果一直37.5以上我会被送到很远的地方。只好作弊弄了个37度，具体过程不说了。然后我被开车送到了丁山镇……关进了一个名为“丁山疗养院”的地方。我明白了，与世隔绝的地方未必是桃花源，也可能是疗养院。

记得我在飞机上和CC开玩笑说，如果被隔离了，怎么送饭？是不是服务员猥琐地把饭放到门口，敲敲门，然后飞奔而去，就怕一开门被传染到。事实上我低估他们了。他们只敢放在楼梯口，然后飞奔而去，打个电话叫我自己去取。通话时间也觉不超过20秒，不超过两句话。可能他们怕“电话也能传播H1N1病毒”——quote小胖。这是有科学依据的，因为电话是虚声，我得的也是“虚病”。

现在还不至于说后悔回国。我还有好几天来改变这次回国的主题。我也会原谅教唆我订机票的CC，尤其是看到她的qq签名“隔离中 27号放出来。 Damn it.”之后，我感觉就像格罗索一样，不是一个人在隔离。

另外，大家打我手机15312292025，骚扰也可以接受。呆在房间里5天不是好受的。

[转]欠款通缉令

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:40:32 GMT

这个头像的主人注意了！

我要在我空间公开你的丑事啦！

小样~你欠我的钱还了吗？

......

什么？记不起来？

哼！那我就要把你通缉到底~~

让大伙都看看到底是谁那么厚脸皮，2毛钱欠到现在还不舍得还！

哈哈~你上当啦

别看着是你的头像就傻不啦叽的跑进来

那张图片被谁看到就显示谁的头像

明白了吧？

赶紧把文章转走忽悠别人乐呵去吧！

有人愿意一淘去旅游么

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:24:26 GMT

如题
细节单聊
愿意请按1，非常愿意请按2

[转]幸福接力棒 <被点是一种幸福>吗？？not really!!

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:25:57 GMT

幸福接力棒 <被点是一种幸福>
被"rocket"点名了。

Q1:你的大名？
答：蒯宣年
Q2:如果看到自己最爱的人熟睡在你面前你会做什么？
答：放心了，都睡身边了
Q3:你认为什么才算是真正幸福？
答：
Q4:你们觉得友情重要还是爱情重要，为什么？
答：一个宁滥勿缺一个宁缺勿滥。。
Q5:你现在有喜欢的人吗!
答：有
Q6:刚刚在干嘛?
答：刷牙
Q7:你现在过得快乐么
答:还不错
Q9:抽煙不？
答：不.
Q10:喜欢小baby吗？
答：喜欢
Q11:最近喜歡聽的歌?
答： Day n' nite, Kyane West, Lil Wanye的，估计两个名字都拼错了
Q12:希望自己多大结婚？
答：22~35吧
Q14:你是不是经常觉得自己很失败呢?
答：偶尔
Q17:没有了爱人,你会怎样呢?
答：不会
Q20:你认为你们所谓的幸福就是以后一辈子的幸福么?
答：现在也要
Q24:覺得自己自戀嗎？
答：没有
Q25:你最讨厌的人会怎样去对待？
答：不对待
Q28：现在最迷什么？
答：人
Q31：你酒品怎麼樣？
答：差
Q32:最想去哪里旅游?
答：LA，巴黎，大连
Q33:一辈子都不会忘记的事?
答：生日！？
Q35:看到天空你想起的第一个人是谁?
答：鸟人？！想不到什么人……
Q36:你会爱TA一辈子么？
答：会
Q37:喜欢你的人和你喜欢的人，你会选哪个？
答：我喜欢的
38:你会以何种方式表现你对他（她）的爱?
答：等着瞧
Q39:喜欢我麼？理由!
答：喜欢。但我不支持同性恋
Q40:如果你想痛扁一个人,你觉得那个人是?
答：Head of house
Q41:伱有後珻過自魢啲決啶麼？
答：后悔接了这个题海。过去一年还没做过那么多提。
Q42：曾经爱过的人要和你做朋友，你会接受馬？
答：可以阿
Q44：你是好孩子么 ?
答：是
Q46: 在黑夜独自神伤的时候,手机里有能被打扰的人吗?
答：嘿，有
Q47:喜欢下雨不？为什么？
答：不。没活力
Q49:如果你的他（她）哭了，你的第一个举动是什么？
答：我笑了。现在想想不该这样
Q50：你相信爱情吗?为什么?
答：相信，什么意思？
Q51：希望和我一直做朋友么？？？
答: Ab-thefxxking-solutely
Q53：他什么都没有，你还愿意陪着他/她吗
答：哪会什么都没有
Q54：今天你快乐吗？
答：不错
Q55:当最熟悉的人变成陌生人你会怎么面对?
答：顺其自然
Q56:为什么我们不能说不爱了就不爱了？
答：说之前就不爱了
Q59：这个幸福接力棒接的下去不？
答：不会。我没做点名传点名的习惯
Q60：你睡觉前都想什么?
答：人！！
Q61:最想对我说的话...
答：享受假期
Q62.一个人的时候时常干什么？
答：上网。学习。
Q64：什么时候会想起他(她)?****
答：随时。这几个套用王的答案了
Q65：回答完这些题目想说什么？
答：谁出的
Q66：最想回到什麼時候？
答：随便的
Q67：出现过一个可以猜对你心思的异性吗？？
答：没
Q69：你想对你的朋友、还有周围的人、说什么？
答：我就在你们周围
Q70:200⑨**** 你想到的第一个人，為什麼？
答：？？？
Q74:你觉得女生卷发好还是直发好：
答：以前我很明确,现在答案正在变模糊（套用答案。。btw,以前明确答案是直发）
Q75:你观察一个人的时候，最先注意TA哪一点呢？WHY?
答：我看人不看外表看内涵的，比如说罩杯……kidding..脸吧没什么特别注重
Q76:你愿意相亲吗？
答：以后有机会玩玩，听说比想象的有趣
Q77:你觉得你有什么吸引异性的地方？
答：我是男的（你这答案...）
Q78:对我的评价和看法！
答: Fantastic
Q79:当你答到这的时候眼睛就花了吧？
答：没
Q80:遇到很極品的舍友，你會怎么做？
答：珍惜在一起的时光。用了
Q81:遇到很纠结的事情，你该怎么办？
答：不去想它。和王相反，我会good good think think
Q82：会因为寂寞而恋爱吗？
答：会，寂寞之后也许会后悔。say得好，用了
Q83：相信命中注定吗？
答：不
Q84: 哪一型的男(女)生比较吸引你?
答: 有内涵的，真的内涵
Q85：你是个恋家的人吗
答：是的
Q86：写出你现在喜欢的人名字
答：陈奕
Q87：你已经开始怀念了吗？怀念什么？
答：昨天和她吃饭
Q88：是否痛恨传給你点卷的人
答：哪会
Q89：我是不是真的很傻？
答:傻得好。人有时就该这样
Q90：知道为什么传给你吗？
答:不知道
Q91：你会传下去不？
答:不会
Q92:突然性死亡的刹那,你会想起谁?
答：什么玩意，想你妹！！
Q93：会记得我很久么？
会的
Q94：当你伤害了最好的朋友之后要怎么办？
答：哪会
Q95：答应我不要让自己难过，好吗？
答：好
Q96:爱的付出一定有回报吗??
答: 哪会

我就不传了。另外看到名字又被打错了

我叫蒯宣年，不叫蒯轩年，更不叫蒯宣岩！

谁动了我的脑残片？！

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Sat, 23 May 2009 12:59:54 GMT

事情是这样的。Farmar和Sasha已经打了一年的铁了，不过Farmar最近脑子好了起来，可惜热血中年Fisher乐此不疲地把自己当D-Wade一样杀进内线——被帽。更恶心的是Phil Jackson不知怎么就是不用占尽优势的Andrew Bynum和思路清醒的Jordan Farmar，在Game2 里面关门放Fish+Sasha。结果两人合计1-13。赛后Andrew采访说‘absolute not angry, but disappointed not contributing more. chat with him if he approaches.’显然对除了装13什么都不会的禅师不满意。The bottom line is, 下面这个笑话诞生了：
Farmar=农民 Fisher=当年小鱼现在老鱼 Sasha Vujuacic=浪莎(浪投的萨沙) Phil=KFC
农民：PHUCK！谁动了我的脑残片！！！
老鱼：老子吃了一片，怎么着？
农民：可是少了不止一片啊…
老鱼：老子那么大年纪还会骗你？一片就是一片！
农民：……
浪莎（弱弱的举手）：我……我一时好奇，吃了两三片，农兄不见怪吧…
农民：吃个两三片也就算了，可谁TM那么缺德全吃了，一片儿也不给老子剩！教练，您看看，这事儿怎么办？
KFC：呃……这个事情，我看就算了，偶尔贪嘴而已。

最后为明天GAME3攒下人品，受L.A. TIMES的启发……
Let us Pray：
OUR FATHER,

WE KNOW THOU TAKEST NO SIDE IN GAMES AMONG THY CREATURES, BUT JUST THIS ONCE, PLEASE LET OUR NUGGETS, WHOSE PIETY AND LOVE FOR YOU NEVER WANED IN THEIR MANY TRIALS, MORAL OR CRIMINAL, BEAT THE LAKERS, WHO ARE SWOLLEN AND CORPULENT AS PIGS WITH SUCCESS.

Amen.

Shut the Pokers ,er.., I mean Lakers out! 1，2，3——BEAT LA!!!

check my fb&twitter

313737948@qq.com(Christopher) — Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:44:54 GMT

joined a moment ago but i guess i have no time to twiddle with twitters.
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/profile.php?id=1584511295&ref=profile
http://twitter.com/ChrisJET31